Scott Karp of Publishing 2.0 has posted an interesting article today: What Is The ROI Of Requiring User Registration To Access Online Content? , in which he takes a close look at the registration wall used by the New York Times online and wonders whether it is worthwhile.
The theory goes that personal data collected from registered users enables sites to better target ads and charge premium rates. But I wonder whether the lost traffic from users who choose not to jump through the registration hoop — which I bet is particularly true of NYTimes’ large volume of visitors from search engines — outweighs the gain of higher ads rates (assuming NYTimes.com is consistently able to charge higher rates).
As Karp notes, the registration requirement presents a barrier to access for users who come in through a search engine, at a time when NYTimes.com is focused on growing their readership beyond the current regular readers; and these casual users are just the type of users who are likely to have a lower tolerance for jumping through registration hoops, notwithstanding the NYTimes.com claim that registration takes "only a minute".
In one of the comments to the article, Howard Owens responds by questioning a critical assumption; Owens asserts that the registration requirement does not, in fact, cause traffic to drop.
I’ve run two registration sites, and have spoken with other newspaper.com site managers who have run their own registration-required sites, and two things I found to be true based on empirical evidence:
1) There is no drop off in traffic past the first 60 days of registration (after 60 days, traffic exceeds pre-registration numbers and continues to grow).
...
Personally I believe that the ROI of requiring user registration is questionable at best. Intuitively, it makes sense that at least some users will get discouraged and drop off when confronted with a "registration required" notice; so there's bound to be some negative impact, with all due respect to Howard Owens [perhaps the numbers he saw can be explained by other changes that happened at the same time, such as SEO enhancements that bumped up traffic, compensating for the impact of the registration?].
At the same time, there is another major trend currently under way that will increase the importance of this debate, and in my opinion, accelerate the crumbling of these registration and payment walls.
This big change is in user behavior. Individual consumers are increasingly flocking first to the major search engines when looking for information and data, rather than to individual web sites, even when they already know high-quality sites that can provide the information. It makes sense from the user's point of view: the user wants to find high-quality content in general, regardless of source, and using a favorite search engine is a quick, easy and comfortable way to do that. This overall trend is inevitable and irreversible. As Don Dodge noted in a recent article: Search engines are the Start page for the Internet.
Empirical evidence indicates that, even for major web sites with strong brands, the number of users coming in from search engines is increasing as a percentage of total traffic (although I do not have hard numbers to back up this claim). This forces content publishers to open up more information in order to satisfy those users, which further solidifies the position of search engines as the starting point - which in turn, forces publishers to open up yet more information - and so on, in a self-reinforcing virtuous cycle.
As publishers see this changing user mix - a higher percentage of traffic consisting of new users coming from search engines - engaging those users will increase in importance, and putting barriers in their path will be less acceptable. Instead, publishers will be forced to find new and innovative models for monetization; similarly, user tracking methods will need to be improved to collect data implicitly rather than requiring explicit action from the user.
As the user starts interacting with the site - if she wants to comment, post or otherwise participate, for example - then progressive upsells into registration and payment are perfectly valid and acceptable. By that point, the site is dealing with thoroughly-engaged users, not casual visitors.
I see it as a question of time before 99% of content from major publishers (NYTimes.com included) becomes free and openly accessible on the Web.
To paraphrase Cory Doctorow (he of the free books !) and Tim O'Reilly, on content: the real danger isn't loss of revenue through sharing, it's obscurity and irrelevance.
Since I ran these sites and was intimately involved in every detail -- I can tell you NOTHING changed beyond requiring registration.
Note, I'm not arguing in favor of newspaper registration walls. I'm just saying that to say they hurt newspaper.com traffic is flat wrong. And I'm 100 percent certain of that.
As for search engine traffic -- more than 80 percent of it is absolutely useless to a local newspaper.com. It's darn near impossible to make meaningful revenue from all of that out of town traffic. In fact, worse than that, that out of town traffic depresses click-through rates for local advertisers (making their ads look like they're performing worse than they are), and sucks non-monitizable bandwidth from the site.
That said, most sites with registration schemes now do not put up the registration wall for traffic coming in through a SE.
In fact, very few sites these days have very high registration walls.
Posted by: Howard Owens | December 28, 2007 at 05:45 AM
We live in an age where everything that can be automated has either already undergone automation or is semiautomatic. Some things that had no business being automated are also automatic.
Posted by: north face jackets on sale | December 10, 2010 at 07:54 PM
friend just in his earlier forties with this entire body and replica ysl shoes dermis treatment are quite good, but can not say that temperament Fortunately, yves saint laurent shoes appears incredibly young. She obtained it swiftly took cardstock towel do yves saint laurent boots not include the bag of drinking water around the observe shoes. yves saint laurent sandals a pair of sandals that start looking incredibly uncomplicated but I can not envision the heel is
ysl shoes replica cheap there ought to be twelve to 13 cm new ysl replica! footwear observed through the bottom and is also transparent towards the incredibly beautiful! ysl shoes replica I sat back again and her cochristian louboutinpilot location greetingchristian louboutin cage bootie What regrettably the rainfall to catch up. ysl tribute replica shoes of course ah .. my footwear soaked with drinking water may perhaps not come across the next poor bags of …! replica ysl shoes uk I wonder why she was afraid of flood harm for pairs other footwear .. to not say that large rainfall slippery even putting on footwear …! replica ysl shoes online < br> we need to get away to some destination. She overshoes I very first began the auto to available the doorway to
knockoff ysl shoes online assist her ft splashing some chilly drinking water incredibly thoroughly. She Dianzhe legs go out. with the workplaces on the hall Oh replica ysl shoes sale her shoe again. I then stated that this shoe appears very good observed with a ysl tribute sandal replica incredibly good unique consequences and transparent very good !
Posted by: donzi | August 08, 2011 at 01:01 AM
I expect to see your new share.ma le scarpe non ti donano. meglio dei sandali con stringe più sottili e caviglia libera Perfect!
Posted by: pandora beads | August 10, 2011 at 10:56 PM
Personally I believe that the ROI of requiring user registration is questionable at best. Intuitively, it makes sense that at least some users will get discouraged and drop off when confronted with a "registration required" notice; so there's bound to be some negative impact, with all due respect to Howard Owens [perhaps the numbers he saw can be explained by other changes that happened at the same time, such as SEO enhancements that bumped up traffic, compensating for the impact of the registration?].
Posted by: pandora bracelets | August 28, 2011 at 08:35 PM
These articles written too great,they rich contents ma le scarpe non ti donano. meglio dei saiù sottili e caviglia libera Perfect! and data accurately.they are help to me.I expect to see your new share.
Posted by: Canada Goose Solaris Parka | September 21, 2011 at 04:09 AM
Thank you for this article. Whitespace is something I have ignored in the past, but will make use of in the future.
Posted by: http://www.uggsaleorg.com | November 02, 2011 at 07:29 PM
"Bad, you exactly how many secret!" Impatiens beauty to love a joyous people, the more see more will claw. Of kind of the bad guy is likable, always have so many girls around concave!!!! Look after yourself as the fallen petal that, night lure him.
Posted by: cocktail dresses | December 01, 2011 at 11:27 PM
"You don't have money, but not take one million buy my reward store content ring?"
Posted by: cocktail dresses | December 09, 2011 at 12:00 AM
Very good written article. It will be helpful to anyone who uses it, including yours truly. Keep up the good work – for sure i will check out more posts. http://www.louboutinshoes2u.com
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | December 28, 2011 at 05:25 PM
I absolutely love this site.. shoes came right on time nd they areee generous got 2 pairs and the stitching A quality love them, The design and the look of your site are really nice! It makes my reading even more interesting and pleasant! - http://www.kisslouboutin.com/
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | December 28, 2011 at 05:25 PM